<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Glass Hammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theglasshammer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com</link>
	<description>The Glass Hammer is an online community designed for women executives in financial services, law and business. Visit us daily to discover issues that matter, share experiences, and plan networking, your career and your life. Get a new job right here!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom by Tina Vasquez</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/16/the-unexpected-stay-at-home-mom/comment-page-1/#comment-6573</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Vasquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4402#comment-6573</guid>
		<description>Hi, Beverley. It wasn&#039;t my intention to imply that women can only be successful while working and that they are unsuccessful or unemployed if at home. I work from home, so I would never assume that other women who spend their days at home or who spend their days with their children are necessarily unemployed. It definitely doesn&#039;t mean that they&#039;re unsuccessful, either. The idea that women can&#039;t be successful if they&#039;re not working isn&#039;t something I believe, but those feelings were expressed by the women I featured in the article. Those are their feelings, not mine and I don&#039;t believe those particular feelings are representative of all women.

Also, it&#039;s important to point out that women who&#039;ve spent their lives focusing on their career- even after having children- may struggle with what &quot;successful&quot; means after being laid off. It&#039;s one thing to decide to put your career on the backburner and choose to stay home with your kids, but it&#039;s quite another to be laid off and forced into that situation. Their definition of success may differ from yours, but it doesn&#039;t make either definition more or less valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Beverley. It wasn&#8217;t my intention to imply that women can only be successful while working and that they are unsuccessful or unemployed if at home. I work from home, so I would never assume that other women who spend their days at home or who spend their days with their children are necessarily unemployed. It definitely doesn&#8217;t mean that they&#8217;re unsuccessful, either. The idea that women can&#8217;t be successful if they&#8217;re not working isn&#8217;t something I believe, but those feelings were expressed by the women I featured in the article. Those are their feelings, not mine and I don&#8217;t believe those particular feelings are representative of all women.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s important to point out that women who&#8217;ve spent their lives focusing on their career- even after having children- may struggle with what &#8220;successful&#8221; means after being laid off. It&#8217;s one thing to decide to put your career on the backburner and choose to stay home with your kids, but it&#8217;s quite another to be laid off and forced into that situation. Their definition of success may differ from yours, but it doesn&#8217;t make either definition more or less valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom by Autistic Children Benefit From Chiropractic Treatment In Costa Mesa California</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/16/the-unexpected-stay-at-home-mom/comment-page-1/#comment-6563</link>
		<dc:creator>Autistic Children Benefit From Chiropractic Treatment In Costa Mesa California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4402#comment-6563</guid>
		<description>[...] The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom &#187; The Glass Hammer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom &raquo; The Glass Hammer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom by BeverleySmith</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/16/the-unexpected-stay-at-home-mom/comment-page-1/#comment-6559</link>
		<dc:creator>BeverleySmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4402#comment-6559</guid>
		<description>It might be useful for the writer above to consider if terms used show real value for women. She is saying that women are &#039;successful working&#039; mothers if earning and&#039;unemployed &#039; if at home.  This attitude is very traditional economics, male paradigm undervaluing of half of all women.  It is patriarchy at its finest.

Sadly as a woman who worked hard in the 1970s to get pay equity and gender equality, it has to be admitted that the movement has not yet come full way. It has stalled at the half way point, and predictably one that still prefers male roles. Now it allows women to do these roles outside the home and that&#039;s a liberation of sorts, but now it forces women outside the home which is a bad thing. It still says women&#039;s care roles of the young, sick, handicapped, elderly or dying don&#039;t matter. It still insults all traditional female roles as useless, selfish, lazy, unemployed, unproductive in the economy, hobbies and not using skills. All of those assumptions are wrong, and are very big insults to the women&#039;s rights movement.  
I was home for many years though a gold medallist at university - and the reason was because I was passionately convinced that my skills were best used to nurture my children. I taught them to crawl and walk and use a spoon and to read and do math and to share and take turns. I taught them my moral code and how to discuss opinions calmly and I gave them the security of my presence 24-7 on call as needed, to anchor them in life. I answered their gazillion questions and gave them the science exposure with museums and  zoos and libraries that opened up their world. As a &#039;stay at home&#039; mom I was out with the kids twice every single day on learning outings.  I found that this role used all my skills academically and all my patience.  I don&#039;t feel superior to mothers who choose differently for they try to find caregivers who match their values . But it is completely unfair to have them judge me. I am now  back in the paid labor force and feel women&#039;s real liberation is to be funded either way, to have money flow with the child, to have our care roles valued in our words and in our tax policy and in our pensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be useful for the writer above to consider if terms used show real value for women. She is saying that women are &#8217;successful working&#8217; mothers if earning and&#8217;unemployed &#8216; if at home.  This attitude is very traditional economics, male paradigm undervaluing of half of all women.  It is patriarchy at its finest.</p>
<p>Sadly as a woman who worked hard in the 1970s to get pay equity and gender equality, it has to be admitted that the movement has not yet come full way. It has stalled at the half way point, and predictably one that still prefers male roles. Now it allows women to do these roles outside the home and that&#8217;s a liberation of sorts, but now it forces women outside the home which is a bad thing. It still says women&#8217;s care roles of the young, sick, handicapped, elderly or dying don&#8217;t matter. It still insults all traditional female roles as useless, selfish, lazy, unemployed, unproductive in the economy, hobbies and not using skills. All of those assumptions are wrong, and are very big insults to the women&#8217;s rights movement.<br />
I was home for many years though a gold medallist at university &#8211; and the reason was because I was passionately convinced that my skills were best used to nurture my children. I taught them to crawl and walk and use a spoon and to read and do math and to share and take turns. I taught them my moral code and how to discuss opinions calmly and I gave them the security of my presence 24-7 on call as needed, to anchor them in life. I answered their gazillion questions and gave them the science exposure with museums and  zoos and libraries that opened up their world. As a &#8217;stay at home&#8217; mom I was out with the kids twice every single day on learning outings.  I found that this role used all my skills academically and all my patience.  I don&#8217;t feel superior to mothers who choose differently for they try to find caregivers who match their values . But it is completely unfair to have them judge me. I am now  back in the paid labor force and feel women&#8217;s real liberation is to be funded either way, to have money flow with the child, to have our care roles valued in our words and in our tax policy and in our pensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beyond Business as Usual: More Working Moms in Part-Time Positions by sunrisedatacare</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/02/16/beyond-business-as-usual-more-working-moms-in-part-time-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-6554</link>
		<dc:creator>sunrisedatacare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4245#comment-6554</guid>
		<description>http://coomararunodaya.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://coomararunodaya.com" rel="nofollow">http://coomararunodaya.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom by Make Your Own Romantic Spa On Valentine&#8217;s Day &#124; Articles on Bath and Body Products</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/16/the-unexpected-stay-at-home-mom/comment-page-1/#comment-6550</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Your Own Romantic Spa On Valentine&#8217;s Day &#124; Articles on Bath and Body Products</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4402#comment-6550</guid>
		<description>[...] The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom &#187; The Glass Hammer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom &raquo; The Glass Hammer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women Fleeing Tech Field: Causes and Solutions by Ingrid</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/01/28/women-fleeing-tech-field-causes-and-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-6548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4123#comment-6548</guid>
		<description>I worked in IT for 10 years and have recently left the field not because of sexism but because of the decline in working conditions. 

Although it is true that I lacked mentors and female colleagues, I feel that the rampant outsourcing and allowing visas in professions that were in decline (namely after the dot-com crash) in recent years has reduced working conditions locally. I had my salary halve in a short number of years and the opportunities available are far less glamorous. Personally, I don&#039;t want to work nights and weekends so that pretty much eliminates all opportunities that I&#039;m qualified for. I was laid off nine months ago and have started my own company that allows me to work flexible hours from home, and I&#039;m much happier for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked in IT for 10 years and have recently left the field not because of sexism but because of the decline in working conditions. </p>
<p>Although it is true that I lacked mentors and female colleagues, I feel that the rampant outsourcing and allowing visas in professions that were in decline (namely after the dot-com crash) in recent years has reduced working conditions locally. I had my salary halve in a short number of years and the opportunities available are far less glamorous. Personally, I don&#8217;t want to work nights and weekends so that pretty much eliminates all opportunities that I&#8217;m qualified for. I was laid off nine months ago and have started my own company that allows me to work flexible hours from home, and I&#8217;m much happier for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom by The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom » The Glass Hammer &#124; Blogging For Moms Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/16/the-unexpected-stay-at-home-mom/comment-page-1/#comment-6543</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom » The Glass Hammer &#124; Blogging For Moms Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4402#comment-6543</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom » The Glass Hammer AKPC_IDS += &quot;162,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [?]   Share The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom » The Glass Hammer AKPC_IDS += &quot;162,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [?]   Share The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom by Successful SEO Comes Inexpensive &#124; Internet Marketing Help</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/16/the-unexpected-stay-at-home-mom/comment-page-1/#comment-6536</link>
		<dc:creator>Successful SEO Comes Inexpensive &#124; Internet Marketing Help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4402#comment-6536</guid>
		<description>[...] The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom » The Glass Hammer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Unexpected Stay-at-Home Mom » The Glass Hammer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MOVE Project: Top Accounting Firms Trying to Find Out Why Women Leave the Industry by Maintaining a Successful Career as a Woman Accountant&#160;&#124;&#160;CPACareerCoach.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2009/09/24/the-move-project-top-accounting-firms-trying-to-find-out-why-women-leave-the-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>Maintaining a Successful Career as a Woman Accountant&#160;&#124;&#160;CPACareerCoach.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=2947#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>[...] technology, and big business,” women public accountants don’t stay in the field for long. In  a recent article    , GlassHammer reports that many women successfully begin careers as accountants, but they leave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology, and big business,” women public accountants don’t stay in the field for long. In  a recent article    , GlassHammer reports that many women successfully begin careers as accountants, but they leave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Norway working? The case for women on boards by Candyce</title>
		<link>http://www.theglasshammer.com/news/2010/03/11/is-norway-working-the-case-for-women-on-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-6502</link>
		<dc:creator>Candyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglasshammer.com/?p=4382#comment-6502</guid>
		<description>It seems a little shortsighted to conclude that adding women to the board contributed to a decline in share price if the order was made compulsory in 2006 with a 2-year transition period. The economy started its decline in August 2007, so most companies would have dramatically declined in value from 2007 to 2009 regardless of board composition. Did the report consider this and compare the declines in companies without women on the board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a little shortsighted to conclude that adding women to the board contributed to a decline in share price if the order was made compulsory in 2006 with a 2-year transition period. The economy started its decline in August 2007, so most companies would have dramatically declined in value from 2007 to 2009 regardless of board composition. Did the report consider this and compare the declines in companies without women on the board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
